CVE-2026-48077
Full vulnerability record from the local CVENow database.
Description
OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.1.0, the GET handler at `/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/{appointmentId}` performs no authorization check before returning the appointment record. Any party who knows or obtains a valid appointment UUID receives the full row, including channel and agent IDs, time and timezone, status, and the AES-GCM ciphertext components (`encryptedPayload`, `iv`, `authTag`, `dataKey`). The same file's DELETE handler calls `checkPermission(locals, tenantId, true)` before allowing deletion. The intent is clear: appointment records are tenant-scoped and require authentication to access. The GET handler is missing the equivalent call. The middleware chain (`apiAuthHandle`, `authGuard`) does not compensate: API paths bypass `authGuard` entirely, and `apiAuthHandle` does not block requests to non-admin paths when no token is present. Version 1.1.0 patches the issue.
View original CVE JSON
{
"id": "CVE-2026-48077",
"sourceIdentifier": "[email protected]",
"published": "2026-08-06T22:17:10.267",
"lastModified": "2026-10-23T21:10:00.157",
"vulnStatus": "Deferred",
"cveTags": [],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "OpenReception's appointment booking software provides an end-to-end encrypted appointment booking platform. Prior to version 1.1.0, the GET handler at `/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/{appointmentId}` performs no authorization check before returning the appointment record. Any party who knows or obtains a valid appointment UUID receives the full row, including channel and agent IDs, time and timezone, status, and the AES-GCM ciphertext components (`encryptedPayload`, `iv`, `authTag`, `dataKey`). The same file's DELETE handler calls `checkPermission(locals, tenantId, true)` before allowing deletion. The intent is clear: appointment records are tenant-scoped and require authentication to access. The GET handler is missing the equivalent call. The middleware chain (`apiAuthHandle`, `authGuard`) does not compensate: API paths bypass `authGuard` entirely, and `apiAuthHandle` does not block requests to non-admin paths when no token is present. Version 1.1.0 patches the issue."
},
{
"lang": "es",
"value": "El software de reserva de citas de OpenReception proporciona una plataforma de reserva de citas cifrada de extremo a extremo. Antes de la versión 1.1.0, el gestor GET en “/api/tenants/{id}/appointments/{appointmentId}” no realiza ninguna comprobación de autorización antes de devolver el registro de la cita. Cualquier parte que conozca u obtenga un UUID de cita válido recibe la fila completa, incluyendo los ID de canal y agente, la hora y la zona horaria, el estado y los componentes del texto cifrado AES-GCM (“encryptedPayload”, “iv”, “authTag”, “dataKey”). El gestor DELETE del mismo archivo llama a “checkPermission(locals, tenantId, true)” antes de permitir la eliminación. La intención es clara: los registros de citas tienen alcance de inquilino y requieren autenticación para acceder. Al gestor GET le falta la llamada equivalente. La cadena de middleware (“apiAuthHandle”, “authGuard”) no compensa: las rutas de la API omiten “authGuard” por completo, y “apiAuthHandle” no bloquea las solicitudes a rutas no administrativas cuando no hay ningún token presente. La versión 1.1.0 corrige el problema."
}
],
"affected": [
{
"source": "[email protected]",
"affectedData": [
{
"vendor": "open-reception",
"product": "appointment-booking-software",
"versions": [
{
"version": "< 1.1.0",
"status": "affected"
}
]
}
]
}
],
"metrics": {
"cvssMetricV31": [
{
"source": "[email protected]",
"type": "Secondary",
"cvssData": {
"version": "3.1",
"vectorString": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"baseScore": 5.3,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"scope": "UNCHANGED",
"confidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"integrityImpact": "NONE",
"availabilityImpact": "NONE"
},
"exploitabilityScore": 3.9,
"impactScore": 1.4
}
],
"ssvcV203": [
{
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"ssvcData": {
"timestamp": "2026-08-07T15:00:28.462761Z",
"id": "CVE-2026-48077",
"options": [
{
"exploitation": "poc"
},
{
"automatable": "yes"
},
{
"technicalImpact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"version": "2.0.3"
}
}
]
},
"weaknesses": [
{
"source": "[email protected]",
"type": "Secondary",
"description": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CWE-862"
}
]
}
],
"references": [
{
"url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/commit/16474d96c591e246a103b9d6aa15ca30d436d11b",
"source": "[email protected]"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-8547-9x2c-9vmf",
"source": "[email protected]"
},
{
"url": "https://github.com/open-reception/appointment-booking-software/security/advisories/GHSA-8547-9x2c-9vmf",
"source": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0"
}
]
}